FAQs answered by Dr. McLean


Why are there two numbers on my exam?

Generally, on your paper Exam, you will find a Raw Total and an Adjusted Score:

How can I best study for the exams?

I feel rushed to get through the whole exam.  Why are the exams so long?

If each exam had fewer (or less complex) questions, it would reduce the time pressure to finish.  In fact, that would probably make my job easier:  fewer questions means fewer things to grade.  But the length I choose has the following reasons.

  1. Physics is all about problem solving.  Probably the most important aspect of solving a problem is getting the correct answer.  But another important aspect is being able to solve problems quickly.  If you can solve a problem more quickly, that indicates that you understand the concepts involved more thoroughly.  By including time pressure as an element of the exams, I can give students credit for that deeper understanding.

    Note that this deeper understanding is not something you are born with.  You, too, can deepen your understanding of the physics (and your problem solving speed) by practicing.  Being able to complete problems without errors is important, but it is not the last step in learning.

    In contrast, physics is not as much about memorization (although there are a few equations and numbers I expect you to memorize).  Because memorization is an all-or-nothing thing, I would not choose to build time pressure into a test of memorization.

  2. With fewer questions, some topics would be left off the exam entirely.  At best, that would be annoying to students who have studied those topics.  At worst, it could be considered unfair, making studying partly a guessing game of, "What will be on the exam this time?"

  3. The Science of Sound is taken by students with a wide variety of backgrounds.  While for most of the class time pressure will be an aspect of the Exam, there will also be some students in the class who finish before time is up.  I try to adjust the difficulty so that there is a reasonable spread.

How do you decide how much to put into a exam, anyway?

My rule of thumb is that I should be able to finish the exam in roughly 1/4 of the time allowed to you.  I usually actually "take" the exam myself, to test the length.

Are exams with time pressure fair?

In a word: Yes, I believe they are fair.  In fact, I think they are more fair, for the reasons given above.

But how can you judge this yourself?

Some people like to compare school tests to real life.  Their premise is that school is preparing you for real life.  And real life certainly does not give you unlimitted time to solve your problems!  However, I don't totally buy in to this perspective.  Afterall, it is frequently noted that "life isn't fair!"  I think academic grading should aspire to a higher level of fairness, so that in the end your transcript accurately reflects who you are.

In the final analysis, I believe that "fairness" should be judged on the grades distributed.  For each exam, after grading the whole class I review whether the numerical scores accurately reflect the work I have just reviewed.  If the numbers need adjustment, I apply an scale, the form of which I have put considerable thought into.

So please delay forming an opinion until you see your grade.  This is especially important if you are reading this just after taking the first exam.  You may feel like you did really poorly, while in reality you just aren't used to this testing format. Your grade may surprise you.

If you do feel that the grade you recieve is inappropriate, please come discuss it with me.  I am dedicated to giving fair grades, and I promise to give you my full consideration.